Colville Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Colville
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Colville Births to Unmarried Women
45.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,225,261 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 45.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.19% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Colville and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Colville influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Colville simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Colville by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Puerto Rican (45.7%, a difference of 0.78%), Yuman (44.4%, a difference of 2.1%), Black/African American (44.3%, a difference of 2.3%), Houma (46.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and Arapaho (47.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 47.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 48.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 49.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 50.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 51.1% |
Colville Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colville Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.026% | 30.2% |
| Maximum | 76.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 76.6% | 69.8% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 68.6% |
| Median | 7.2% | 63.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 46.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.0% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 43.3% | 53.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.3% | 25.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.7% | 25.3% |
Correlation Details
| Colville Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.026% | 34,041,978 | 30.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 101,760 | 46.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 28,699 | 63.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 7,070 | 64.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 6,885 | 40.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 5,247 | 57.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 1,310 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 4,225 | 30.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 5,587 | 97.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 561 | 69.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.54% | 4,877 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 1,098 | 100.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.22% | 9,218 | 62.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 424 | 100.0% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.81% | 1,538 | 35.7% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.06% | 1,334 | 35.7% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.01% | 276 | 81.8% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.15% | 270 | 81.8% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.38% | 568 | 62.5% |
[ 64.5% - 65.0% ] 64.91% | 1,103 | 50.0% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.97% | 256 | 100.0% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.66% | 977 | 100.0% |