Sri Lankan Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Sri Lankan Births to Unmarried Women
28.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,137,985 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179 and weighted average of 28.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.17% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Sri Lankans and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Sri Lankans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Sri Lankans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Jordan (29.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (29.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from France (29.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Poland (28.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (29.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Zimbabweans | 98.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Danes | 98.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 98.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Immigrants from Austria | 98.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Romanians | 98.0 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 28.7% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 98.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 28.8% |
| Immigrants from Poland | 97.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 28.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 97.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.9% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 97.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 29.0% |
| Taiwanese | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 29.0% |
| Immigrants from France | 97.3 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 29.0% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 29.1% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 96.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 29.1% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 96.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 29.2% |
| Arabs | 96.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 29.2% |
Sri Lankan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 6.9% |
| Maximum | 45.1% | 69.0% |
| Range | 45.0% | 62.1% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 29.5% |
| Median | 10.6% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 34.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 10.1% |
Correlation Details
| Sri Lankan Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 193,273,365 | 35.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 92,220,589 | 31.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 47,120,562 | 31.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 21,325,233 | 28.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 15,757,787 | 30.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 9,315,564 | 26.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 6,930,242 | 24.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.99% | 5,749,935 | 23.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 2,895,225 | 24.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 2,672,564 | 27.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 1,945,264 | 31.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 1,402,286 | 28.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 1,559,051 | 27.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 499,693 | 30.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.93% | 1,518,473 | 27.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 427,496 | 36.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.62% | 469,823 | 25.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.09% | 467,903 | 29.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.48% | 291,233 | 31.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.98% | 453,327 | 29.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.26% | 322,351 | 31.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.64% | 255,928 | 30.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.13% | 462,954 | 31.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.66% | 35,664 | 37.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 157,463 | 43.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.28% | 187,926 | 31.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 127,187 | 33.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.07% | 232,727 | 35.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.62% | 169,222 | 15.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 2,000 | 30.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.33% | 1,094,518 | 20.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.78% | 112,705 | 28.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.63% | 243,185 | 10.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 220,989 | 23.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.35% | 2,215 | 35.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.65% | 27,827 | 69.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.03% | 61,688 | 53.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.90% | 28,576 | 25.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.44% | 51,043 | 38.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.08% | 78,830 | 35.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.68% | 59,851 | 22.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.96% | 96,079 | 28.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.31% | 52,555 | 26.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.59% | 1,575 | 42.9% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.03% | 2,916 | 12.1% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.64% | 183,583 | 21.8% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.51% | 53,826 | 39.4% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.64% | 45,688 | 6.9% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.20% | 171,637 | 31.4% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.91% | 36,657 | 10.1% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.21% | 34,188 | 40.5% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.02% | 47,549 | 20.0% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.14% | 181,268 | 19.4% |