Lithuanian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Lithuanian Births to Unmarried Women
29.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 385,212,926 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 29.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.1% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lithuanians and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lithuanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Lithuanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Lebanese (29.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (29.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Australian (29.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Swedish (29.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 29.3% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 95.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 95.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Australians | 94.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Lebanese | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Lithuanians | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Swedes | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 29.7% |
| Greeks | 93.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 29.7% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 93.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 29.7% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 93.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Lithuanian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.086% | 7.7% |
| Maximum | 15.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 15.5% | 92.3% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 37.3% |
| Median | 4.7% | 31.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 24.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 40.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 22.9% |
Correlation Details
| Lithuanian Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.086% | 247,992,680 | 34.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 78,807,966 | 29.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 29,716,387 | 26.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 11,294,329 | 26.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 6,400,998 | 28.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 4,042,987 | 27.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 1,872,580 | 28.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 1,277,154 | 28.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 774,106 | 26.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 787,707 | 23.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.99% | 539,789 | 31.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 494,786 | 23.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 334,857 | 34.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 183,141 | 33.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 107,822 | 36.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 53,845 | 24.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 42,385 | 20.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.30% | 35,685 | 14.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.52% | 112,583 | 39.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 32,224 | 40.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 7,578 | 7.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 58,505 | 34.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 55,229 | 14.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.45% | 18,922 | 38.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 38,088 | 18.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 10,476 | 32.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.01% | 51,174 | 41.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.25% | 5,119 | 95.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.41% | 2,124 | 18.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 732 | 50.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 9,720 | 26.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 1,927 | 17.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.38% | 9,999 | 25.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.47% | 5,020 | 31.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.00% | 614 | 7.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.14% | 224 | 100.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 4,240 | 52.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.44% | 2,298 | 12.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.65% | 1,699 | 59.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.02% | 5,862 | 42.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.50% | 3,470 | 53.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 1,078 | 21.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.08% | 3,138 | 39.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.43% | 732 | 25.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 2,978 | 39.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 3,411 | 76.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.26% | 2,718 | 72.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 59 | 100.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.54% | 1,454 | 33.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.60% | 327 | 100.0% |