Haitian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Haitian
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Haitian Births to Unmarried Women
38.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Haitian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,356,790 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Haitians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 38.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Haitians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.24% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Haitians and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Haitians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Haitians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Haitians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Haitians are Immigrants from West Indies (38.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (38.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Honduran (38.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Jamaican (38.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Dutch West Indian (38.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 38.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 38.7% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 38.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 38.8% |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 38.9% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 39.0% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 39.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 39.3% |
Haitian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Haitian Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.095% | 18.8% |
| Maximum | 40.3% | 69.7% |
| Range | 40.3% | 50.9% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 41.2% |
| Median | 11.1% | 38.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 34.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 9.9% |
Correlation Details
| Haitian Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.095% | 195,185,362 | 34.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 28,032,024 | 35.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 11,939,304 | 37.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 6,234,366 | 36.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 12,093,795 | 31.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 2,805,607 | 44.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 2,154,615 | 37.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 1,274,985 | 38.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 1,195,028 | 31.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 2,255,770 | 37.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.52% | 824,971 | 33.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 906,205 | 36.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 316,500 | 32.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 755,433 | 44.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 291,468 | 40.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 723,011 | 34.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.50% | 410,336 | 38.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 479,550 | 40.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 701,758 | 34.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.47% | 160,947 | 51.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84% | 395,376 | 50.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.20% | 205,347 | 44.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.51% | 446,605 | 40.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.85% | 174,274 | 35.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 573,440 | 57.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 188,333 | 43.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 117,278 | 60.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.31% | 166,456 | 28.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 79,212 | 54.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 52,166 | 27.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.18% | 375,633 | 34.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.62% | 34,374 | 57.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.85% | 35,555 | 37.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.13% | 72,397 | 27.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.55% | 32,311 | 41.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.93% | 201,267 | 29.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.16% | 153,053 | 36.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.62% | 98,037 | 38.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 177,956 | 37.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.50% | 232,750 | 33.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.85% | 180,853 | 47.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.26% | 94,219 | 55.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 103,341 | 35.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.19% | 144,317 | 37.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 207,337 | 54.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.86% | 30,230 | 30.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 26,814 | 39.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.65% | 14,585 | 69.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.04% | 118,661 | 39.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.33% | 62,604 | 45.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.57% | 86,232 | 18.8% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 34,267 | 28.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.53% | 62,827 | 53.4% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.19% | 10,946 | 42.8% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.62% | 70,810 | 51.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.04% | 62,232 | 45.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.79% | 83,221 | 49.1% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.08% | 40,276 | 48.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.54% | 43,269 | 24.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 35,914 | 49.1% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.25% | 31,807 | 61.3% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.76% | 22,823 | 60.2% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.84% | 48,326 | 31.5% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.77% | 17,163 | 37.4% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.04% | 52,824 | 44.9% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.88% | 59,854 | 39.7% |
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.35% | 58,183 | 51.5% |