Immigrants from Middle Africa In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Immigrants from Middle Africa In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,739,694 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 80.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.57% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Middle Africa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Middle Africa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Immigrants from Middle Africa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Slovene (80.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Pakistan (80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Latvian (80.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Liberia (80.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Ugandans | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Czechs | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Greece | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 80.4% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.047% | 53.7% |
| Maximum | 25.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.6% | 46.3% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 81.5% |
| Median | 3.0% | 81.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 79.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 83.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 6.3% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Middle Africa Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.047% | 132,039,066 | 79.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 33,313,864 | 79.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 15,102,587 | 80.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 7,465,987 | 81.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 4,579,268 | 79.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 2,671,867 | 81.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 1,572,364 | 81.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 959,157 | 81.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 946,046 | 81.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 887,680 | 81.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 621,204 | 79.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 280,786 | 80.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 227,605 | 80.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 296,843 | 81.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 294,753 | 78.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 178,803 | 82.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 122,311 | 77.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 153,287 | 78.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 199,553 | 82.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 127,033 | 82.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 12,365 | 76.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 10,210 | 78.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 105,607 | 85.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 49,856 | 81.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 21,011 | 83.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 3,648 | 93.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 43,554 | 83.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 125,905 | 83.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 2,330 | 53.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 12,233 | 78.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 69,634 | 81.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 76,357 | 82.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 28,427 | 86.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 17,634 | 79.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 27,909 | 85.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 26,684 | 80.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 21,985 | 84.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 2,699 | 71.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 14,443 | 84.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 3,104 | 82.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.99% | 15,489 | 79.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 4,809 | 92.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.47% | 1,997 | 90.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.61% | 422 | 73.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.52% | 1,240 | 84.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.64% | 78 | 100.0% |