Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,602,231 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 79.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Costa Ricans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Costa Ricans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scandinavian (79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Icelander (79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and New Zealander (79.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants from Sweden | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 79.8% |
| Koreans | 79.6 /100 | #144 | Good 79.8% |
| Pakistanis | 79.3 /100 | #145 | Good 79.8% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 78.9 /100 | #146 | Good 79.8% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 78.0 /100 | #147 | Good 79.8% |
| Romanians | 77.6 /100 | #148 | Good 79.8% |
| Icelanders | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 79.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 72.4 /100 | #150 | Good 79.7% |
| Scandinavians | 72.0 /100 | #151 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 72.0 /100 | #152 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 69.5 /100 | #153 | Good 79.7% |
| New Zealanders | 69.4 /100 | #154 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 69.2 /100 | #155 | Good 79.7% |
| Senegalese | 69.1 /100 | #156 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from China | 69.1 /100 | #157 | Good 79.7% |
Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 51.6% |
| Maximum | 26.9% | 92.8% |
| Range | 26.8% | 41.2% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 78.7% |
| Median | 3.8% | 79.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 74.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 83.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 8.5% |
Correlation Details
| Costa Rican Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 193,645,789 | 79.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 35,491,257 | 79.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 11,357,176 | 79.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 4,996,050 | 80.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,813,197 | 80.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,719,023 | 79.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 890,528 | 80.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 648,588 | 80.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 353,272 | 77.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 324,312 | 78.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 218,565 | 79.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 140,157 | 78.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 147,760 | 79.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 73,547 | 79.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 202,355 | 82.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 90,548 | 74.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 38,329 | 77.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 35,924 | 85.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 11,161 | 82.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 45,765 | 78.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 30,438 | 82.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 70,951 | 82.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 40,321 | 83.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 8,266 | 71.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 24,178 | 81.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 12,649 | 83.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 1,273 | 72.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,292 | 86.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 21,507 | 79.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 30,866 | 77.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 8,954 | 86.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 786 | 74.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 9,781 | 80.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 9,105 | 73.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 587 | 68.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 3,309 | 72.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 16,602 | 85.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 616 | 74.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 277 | 73.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 1,519 | 91.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 8,287 | 83.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,373 | 67.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 5,226 | 69.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 9,676 | 88.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 915 | 51.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.41% | 297 | 55.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.55% | 159 | 63.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 14,778 | 85.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.14% | 372 | 89.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 11,906 | 86.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.07% | 1,132 | 92.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.81% | 657 | 90.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 98 | 52.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 4,771 | 81.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 253 | 83.0% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 167 | 77.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.88% | 584 | 89.7% |