Latvian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Latvian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Latvian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,728,272 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 80.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.29% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Latvians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Latvians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Latvians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Czech (80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Liberia (80.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Ugandan (80.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Immigrants from Poland | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 80.6% |
Paraguayans | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 80.6% |
Immigrants from Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 80.6% |
Ugandans | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 80.6% |
Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Immigrants from Liberia | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Czechs | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Immigrants from Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Immigrants from Africa | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 80.4% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 80.4% |
Immigrants from Greece | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 80.4% |
Latvian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.030% | 40.9% |
Maximum | 14.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 14.3% | 59.1% |
Mean | 3.5% | 77.1% |
Median | 2.6% | 79.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 73.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 82.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 11.5% |
Correlation Details
Latvian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 161,515,841 | 79.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 37,616,099 | 81.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 10,125,212 | 81.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,610,996 | 81.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 2,638,204 | 81.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 1,360,177 | 80.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 604,235 | 81.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 614,493 | 81.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 467,655 | 81.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 284,731 | 81.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 192,873 | 81.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 87,279 | 80.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 122,132 | 75.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 76,776 | 84.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 107,968 | 83.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 10,507 | 73.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 31,071 | 82.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 6,472 | 82.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 21,033 | 79.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 20,393 | 83.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 11,493 | 67.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 47,136 | 75.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 10,210 | 84.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,516 | 82.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 4,502 | 76.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 11,282 | 68.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 9,435 | 76.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 13,973 | 78.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 4,276 | 83.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 1,807 | 71.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 20,529 | 80.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 3,992 | 62.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 8,050 | 40.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 1,745 | 78.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 1,392 | 75.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 13,497 | 80.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 3,575 | 71.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 2,010 | 82.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 133 | 72.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 8,425 | 84.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 162 | 78.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 441 | 54.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 402 | 80.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 732 | 76.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 811 | 66.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74% | 187 | 60.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 1,472 | 77.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 2,036 | 80.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 220 | 75.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 1,343 | 73.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 2,143 | 89.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 300 | 75.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.88% | 41 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 159 | 73.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 349 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 774 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 126 | 43.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 4,611 | 72.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.75% | 226 | 93.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 223 | 94.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 771 | 79.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 449 | 68.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 2,313 | 44.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 390 | 47.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 94 | 83.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 428 | 76.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.41% | 442 | 92.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 428 | 69.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.10% | 84 | 83.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.32% | 1,990 | 77.0% |