Immigrants from Eastern Europe In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Immigrants from Eastern Europe In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,884,691 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 80.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.25% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Eastern Europe influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Immigrants from Eastern Europe simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Cypriot (80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Egyptian (80.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Colombia (80.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Romania (80.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Taiwanese | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Bhutanese | 98.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Albanians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Immigrants from Turkey | 98.5 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Soviet Union | 98.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 98.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Cypriots | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Immigrants from Afghanistan | 97.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Egyptians | 97.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Immigrants from Colombia | 97.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Immigrants from Romania | 97.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Asians | 97.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Immigrants from Croatia | 97.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 80.1% |
German Russians | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.21% | 63.7% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.8% | 36.3% |
Mean | 15.4% | 82.2% |
Median | 13.3% | 81.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 78.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 83.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 7.3% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Eastern Europe Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 263,242,090 | 78.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 95,545,187 | 80.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 47,543,672 | 80.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 20,518,436 | 81.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 14,831,006 | 81.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 6,906,373 | 81.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 12,439,887 | 78.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 3,440,793 | 80.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 2,654,898 | 81.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 1,672,995 | 80.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 1,075,901 | 82.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 783,776 | 81.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.26% | 794,965 | 82.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 451,319 | 83.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 407,964 | 81.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 380,972 | 83.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 374,224 | 79.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.75% | 33,254 | 82.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.15% | 257,708 | 78.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.76% | 248,224 | 77.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.24% | 354,466 | 80.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.86% | 411,462 | 79.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.32% | 137,967 | 81.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 164,262 | 79.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.35% | 235,236 | 81.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.81% | 109,026 | 78.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.25% | 79,100 | 78.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.63% | 204,296 | 83.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 46,399 | 79.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.27% | 22,886 | 79.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.75% | 29,743 | 81.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 153,689 | 77.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 820 | 63.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.86% | 84 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.18% | 66,175 | 78.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.64% | 30,080 | 83.0% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.61% | 357 | 91.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.33% | 1,864 | 85.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.89% | 15,393 | 81.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.18% | 1,539 | 78.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.24% | 26,408 | 82.8% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.50% | 8,942 | 83.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 23,200 | 84.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.24% | 202 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.66% | 47,893 | 65.1% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.41% | 238 | 79.2% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.00% | 25 | 100.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.17% | 2,027 | 76.9% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.78% | 23,676 | 78.0% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.31% | 274 | 100.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.78% | 207 | 95.7% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.35% | 83,069 | 75.5% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 42 | 100.0% |