Immigrants from Canada In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Immigrants from Canada In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,408,758 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 79.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.39% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Canada and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Canada influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Immigrants from Canada simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Tlingit-Haida (79.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (79.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North America (79.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (79.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (79.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 5.9 /100 | #227 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Panamanians | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Alsatians | 5.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Lebanese | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 4.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Japanese | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 3.2 /100 | #234 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 3.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Samoans | 2.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Immigrants from North America | 2.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 2.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Welsh | 2.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Jamaicans | 2.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants from Canada In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Canada Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 35.8% |
| Maximum | 47.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 46.9% | 64.2% |
| Mean | 12.3% | 74.5% |
| Median | 10.1% | 75.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 68.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 78.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 12.2% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Canada Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 377,842,792 | 79.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 60,369,677 | 80.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 13,653,918 | 79.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 4,616,874 | 76.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 1,479,549 | 76.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 665,816 | 76.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 216,266 | 75.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 139,318 | 72.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 158,123 | 75.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 56,106 | 73.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.15% | 41,576 | 75.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 21,150 | 68.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 34,534 | 69.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.82% | 17,157 | 77.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.20% | 32,520 | 75.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.68% | 14,996 | 74.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 2,110 | 83.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82% | 5,592 | 72.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 6,791 | 35.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.59% | 2,387 | 71.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 2,383 | 63.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.69% | 2,469 | 74.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 225 | 76.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.87% | 5,275 | 69.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.20% | 3,156 | 64.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.93% | 820 | 78.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.30% | 203 | 73.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.34% | 1,290 | 65.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.74% | 1,323 | 63.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.21% | 2,571 | 65.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 247 | 78.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 4,297 | 63.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.29% | 133 | 79.8% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.74% | 3,907 | 62.4% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.70% | 401 | 84.6% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.26% | 2,498 | 77.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.09% | 23 | 100.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 56 | 100.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.05% | 156 | 47.1% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.93% | 56 | 100.0% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 17 | 100.0% |