Laotian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Laotian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
58.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,862,184 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379 and weighted average of 79.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.49% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Laotians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Laotians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Laotians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Iraq (79.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (79.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (79.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (79.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (79.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Germans | 65.2 /100 | #162 | Good 79.7% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica | 64.6 /100 | #163 | Good 79.7% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 64.4 /100 | #164 | Good 79.7% |
Nigerians | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 79.7% |
Okinawans | 62.7 /100 | #166 | Good 79.6% |
Immigrants from Iraq | 62.0 /100 | #167 | Good 79.6% |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 61.8 /100 | #168 | Good 79.6% |
Laotians | 58.4 /100 | #169 | Average 79.6% |
Slavs | 54.0 /100 | #170 | Average 79.6% |
Immigrants from Switzerland | 53.3 /100 | #171 | Average 79.6% |
Immigrants from Belgium | 53.1 /100 | #172 | Average 79.6% |
Immigrants from Scotland | 52.4 /100 | #173 | Average 79.6% |
Syrians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 79.6% |
Cubans | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 79.5% |
Australians | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 79.5% |
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.051% | 61.7% |
Maximum | 26.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.9% | 38.3% |
Mean | 4.4% | 77.3% |
Median | 2.9% | 78.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 74.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 80.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.7% |
Correlation Details
Laotian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.051% | 165,554,642 | 79.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 36,402,629 | 80.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 10,267,565 | 79.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 5,496,227 | 79.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,241,235 | 79.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 2,038,854 | 80.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 813,243 | 78.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 622,376 | 79.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 177,320 | 83.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 217,786 | 74.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 166,402 | 80.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 158,717 | 78.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 18,184 | 79.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 235,830 | 81.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 45,933 | 81.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 112,979 | 79.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 59,281 | 77.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 44,033 | 80.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 19,498 | 77.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 9,634 | 77.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 12,809 | 78.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 51,720 | 83.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 1,246 | 67.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 6,414 | 65.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 2,466 | 76.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 12,478 | 74.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 1,304 | 75.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 890 | 70.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 4,150 | 81.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 2,123 | 82.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 26,556 | 76.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 1,692 | 75.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 1,392 | 90.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 722 | 75.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 2,052 | 72.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 23,842 | 75.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.62% | 302 | 69.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 619 | 83.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 2,756 | 65.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 236 | 75.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 84 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.94% | 1,634 | 82.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 1,220 | 61.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.91% | 566 | 66.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.97% | 543 | 66.2% |