Ugandan In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Ugandan
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Ugandan In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,069 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 80.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.57% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ugandans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ugandans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Ugandans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Brazilian (80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Liberia (80.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants from Poland | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Ugandans | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Czechs | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 80.5% |
Ugandan In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.016% | 63.6% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 98.3% |
| Range | 15.3% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 81.4% |
| Median | 1.5% | 81.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.68% | 79.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 84.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.7% |
Correlation Details
| Ugandan Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.016% | 81,499,766 | 79.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 6,235,645 | 80.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 2,313,261 | 81.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 1,403,388 | 80.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 576,211 | 81.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 564,431 | 81.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 258,146 | 80.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 194,870 | 84.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 253,519 | 82.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 114,417 | 80.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 123,600 | 78.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 39,941 | 73.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 27,519 | 84.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 18,170 | 80.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 163,767 | 79.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 44,208 | 79.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 13,516 | 75.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 49,074 | 87.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 5,682 | 81.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 238 | 86.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.99% | 604 | 84.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 1,049 | 85.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 14,202 | 79.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 9,019 | 76.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 1,010 | 70.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 16,145 | 79.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 34,536 | 84.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.30% | 6,426 | 84.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 2,274 | 76.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 1,210 | 89.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 26,684 | 80.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.00% | 180 | 63.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 2,900 | 83.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 316 | 98.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.90% | 1,303 | 85.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.32% | 842 | 88.1% |