Menominee Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Menominee
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Menominee Ambulatory Disability
7.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Menominee Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,777,730 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 7.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Menominee and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Menominee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Menominee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Menominee by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Cajun (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 0.89%), Paiute (7.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Pueblo (7.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Menominee Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Menominee Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.023% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 85.2% | 23.9% |
| Range | 85.2% | 20.8% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 9.6% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.1% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 64.5% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 31.8% | 5.5% |
Correlation Details
| Menominee Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023% | 45,255,288 | 6.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 288,301 | 6.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 151,079 | 6.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 27,371 | 6.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 4,656 | 10.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 1,837 | 6.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 4,365 | 8.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 3,133 | 6.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 2,165 | 5.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 521 | 3.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 130 | 4.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 234 | 7.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 593 | 10.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.04% | 1,605 | 11.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 16,657 | 9.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 2,101 | 8.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.77% | 297 | 6.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.05% | 9,212 | 11.0% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.14% | 1,530 | 5.9% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.10% | 173 | 23.4% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.86% | 3,053 | 6.6% |
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.87% | 1,170 | 18.5% |
[ 76.0% - 76.5% ] 76.00% | 150 | 23.9% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.29% | 685 | 19.4% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.18% | 1,424 | 6.4% |