Lumbee Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Lumbee Ambulatory Disability
9.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,273,744 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242 and weighted average of 9.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Houma (9.3%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 7.5%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 8.2%), Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 10.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Lumbee Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 24.6% |
| Range | 84.9% | 20.7% |
| Mean | 20.0% | 11.5% |
| Median | 10.9% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.0% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 4.3% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,461,426 | 6.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 7.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 10.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 120,266 | 10.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,420 | 10.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 11.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 10.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 10.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 13.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 13.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 16.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 16.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 4.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 10.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 11.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.85% | 1,324 | 9.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 16.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 8.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 15.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 906 | 4.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 9.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 13.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 11.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 9.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 15.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 7.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 22.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 15.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 3.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 8.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 18.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 8.9% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 4.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 15.1% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 10.8% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 13.4% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 10.5% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 7.4% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 11.9% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 15.4% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 11.8% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 10.5% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 10.8% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 24.6% |