Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.23% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Oceania influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Immigrants from Oceania simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants from Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants from Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.11% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 20.2% |
Range | 32.1% | 18.6% |
Mean | 8.3% | 8.5% |
Median | 7.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 4.2% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Oceania Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 281,257,817 | 6.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 14,190,741 | 5.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 4,766,173 | 5.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 2,241,993 | 6.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 812,812 | 6.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 510,379 | 7.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 635,400 | 6.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 183,844 | 7.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 261,666 | 6.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 82,926 | 6.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 81,322 | 7.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 208,627 | 7.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.43% | 42,529 | 6.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 4,278 | 7.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 6,869 | 10.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.93% | 5,914 | 9.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 63,374 | 5.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 15,342 | 9.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.06% | 6,299 | 16.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.45% | 5,221 | 7.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 624 | 4.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.32% | 719 | 19.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 2,174 | 7.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 4,185 | 7.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.67% | 1,059 | 16.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.17% | 1,674 | 8.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.20% | 41 | 7.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.94% | 7,236 | 3.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.36% | 5,411 | 1.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 102 | 12.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 198 | 7.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.09% | 188 | 20.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.76% | 693 | 10.3% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.16% | 398 | 11.1% |