Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability
8.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,714,537 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 8.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.12% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tohono O'odham influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Tohono O'odham simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.034% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 37.8% |
Range | 100.0% | 37.5% |
Mean | 31.5% | 12.1% |
Median | 7.6% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.8% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 68.2% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.6% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.0% | 6.9% |
Correlation Details
Tohono O'odham Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 56,787,460 | 6.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 1,357,108 | 7.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 386,792 | 8.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,171 | 7.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 11,962 | 9.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 56,832 | 6.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 7,515 | 4.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 1,835 | 12.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 1,178 | 9.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 1,824 | 7.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 965 | 5.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 5,424 | 13.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 733 | 11.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 7,685 | 13.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.57% | 2,403 | 10.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 454 | 14.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.52% | 3,621 | 14.7% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.96% | 392 | 0.26% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.26% | 2,021 | 12.8% |
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.45% | 918 | 15.6% |
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.32% | 88 | 13.6% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.20% | 314 | 8.3% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.94% | 8,434 | 12.3% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.33% | 204 | 37.8% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.67% | 353 | 12.2% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.12% | 882 | 19.0% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.37% | 187 | 17.1% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 782 | 24.8% |