Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Creek Ambulatory Disability
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.27% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Creek influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Creek simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.037% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 44.6% | 30.8% |
| Range | 44.5% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 12.5% |
| Median | 9.0% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 5.0% |
Correlation Details
| Creek Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.037% | 165,673,970 | 6.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 5,461,076 | 7.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 2,578,153 | 8.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 1,135,579 | 8.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 555,772 | 8.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 567,294 | 8.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 422,807 | 8.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 543,018 | 7.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 433,161 | 8.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 87,585 | 9.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 127,266 | 10.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 104,272 | 11.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 150,431 | 8.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 24,270 | 11.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 63,433 | 5.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 49,223 | 9.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 23,138 | 10.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 61,064 | 11.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.12% | 9,988 | 12.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 31,427 | 12.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 34,437 | 10.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 24,563 | 10.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 495 | 14.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 8,038 | 10.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.44% | 23,323 | 8.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 2,996 | 11.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 758 | 10.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.07% | 1,021 | 15.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.34% | 1,262 | 14.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.59% | 42,642 | 8.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 21,074 | 13.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 20,475 | 9.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 17,879 | 7.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.48% | 15,295 | 12.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 7,093 | 9.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.94% | 17,750 | 10.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 4,602 | 12.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,393 | 19.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.62% | 2,934 | 8.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 3,128 | 11.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.02% | 1,286 | 4.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.49% | 2,572 | 6.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 196 | 13.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.13% | 9,131 | 14.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.41% | 3,181 | 19.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.53% | 247 | 21.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.73% | 5,639 | 15.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.18% | 152 | 10.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 368 | 19.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.33% | 15,212 | 16.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.80% | 1,086 | 7.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 11,366 | 16.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.70% | 9,396 | 13.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.21% | 183 | 2.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.52% | 124 | 4.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.75% | 373 | 20.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.46% | 2,419 | 11.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.65% | 3,048 | 16.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 2,828 | 12.4% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.27% | 375 | 11.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.65% | 119 | 12.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.10% | 210 | 30.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 328 | 12.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.18% | 245 | 12.3% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 894 | 19.8% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.15% | 6,000 | 10.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.77% | 951 | 17.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.92% | 192 | 16.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.27% | 739 | 21.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.66% | 3,373 | 10.7% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.41% | 1,815 | 14.9% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.86% | 1,070 | 13.8% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.31% | 162 | 12.3% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.27% | 121 | 8.7% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.91% | 128 | 14.8% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.85% | 2,480 | 17.8% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.77% | 447 | 22.1% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.25% | 1,498 | 25.0% |
[ 39.5% - 40.0% ] 39.89% | 371 | 14.5% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.58% | 83 | 21.5% |