Tsimshian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Tsimshian Ambulatory Disability
8.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 8.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tsimshian and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tsimshian influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Tsimshian simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 0.59%), Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and Houma (9.3%, a difference of 5.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Tsimshian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.024% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 75.9% | 25.7% |
| Range | 75.8% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 10.2% |
| Median | 3.1% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.4% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.5% | 5.2% |
Correlation Details
| Tsimshian Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 15,404,738 | 5.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 171,789 | 6.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 15,580 | 6.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 3,691 | 13.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 804 | 10.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 1,736 | 11.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 822 | 8.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 838 | 8.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 13,913 | 8.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 8,168 | 7.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 656 | 6.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76% | 361 | 25.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.79% | 546 | 4.1% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.40% | 1,465 | 15.1% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.85% | 1,437 | 15.1% |