Yuman Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Yuman
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Yuman Ambulatory Disability
7.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,645,433 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.306 and weighted average of 7.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yuman within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.071% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yuman and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yuman influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Yuman simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 0.94%), Chickasaw (8.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (7.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and Cajun (7.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Yuman Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 87.0% | 23.5% |
Range | 86.9% | 21.6% |
Mean | 23.7% | 10.2% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.7% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.6% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.1% | 6.5% |
Correlation Details
Yuman Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 40,003,331 | 6.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 503,115 | 6.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 48,669 | 11.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 29,609 | 10.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 3,529 | 21.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 689 | 10.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 19,282 | 3.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 9,106 | 11.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 9,119 | 14.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 527 | 5.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 5,447 | 23.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.35% | 5,062 | 23.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.98% | 362 | 1.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.71% | 1,370 | 5.4% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 120 | 4.9% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.46% | 104 | 14.3% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.95% | 630 | 15.9% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.23% | 1,967 | 12.1% |
[ 72.0% - 72.5% ] 72.47% | 1,867 | 4.4% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.49% | 1,482 | 3.8% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.96% | 46 | 2.5% |