Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,465,206 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.11% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Laos influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Immigrants from Laos simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Laos Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 31.9% | 13.9% |
| Range | 31.9% | 12.5% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 6.9% |
| Median | 3.3% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 2.4% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Laos Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 130,101,065 | 6.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 30,172,422 | 5.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 14,854,843 | 5.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 7,156,471 | 5.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 4,164,515 | 6.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 2,767,490 | 6.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 2,713,771 | 6.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 1,289,060 | 6.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,256,502 | 6.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 831,707 | 6.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 449,931 | 6.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 1,199,877 | 6.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 547,455 | 7.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 394,922 | 6.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,113,467 | 7.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.50% | 107,002 | 7.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 100,924 | 6.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 177,331 | 9.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 183,442 | 7.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 140,535 | 7.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 262,666 | 7.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 66,031 | 7.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 67,210 | 7.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 77,659 | 7.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 74,457 | 7.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 69,767 | 5.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 63,958 | 6.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 337,411 | 5.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 56,927 | 5.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 77,618 | 8.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 8,566 | 9.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 32,651 | 8.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 258 | 11.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 92,651 | 6.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 4,591 | 6.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 9,310 | 12.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 2,433 | 9.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 70,364 | 6.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 789 | 13.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 41,405 | 6.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 146,187 | 6.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 34,220 | 6.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 802 | 6.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 958 | 2.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 14,787 | 4.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 2,984 | 13.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 1,003 | 4.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 5,134 | 5.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.15% | 4,332 | 4.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 5,291 | 9.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 244 | 13.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 17,716 | 3.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 57,662 | 5.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 991 | 8.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 3,208 | 4.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 19,613 | 8.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 1,900 | 5.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 43 | 11.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 153 | 7.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.27% | 55 | 5.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,207 | 3.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 216 | 6.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 1,172 | 4.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 1,693 | 9.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.93% | 1,218 | 5.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 564 | 5.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.57% | 527 | 7.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.49% | 734 | 6.8% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.88% | 138 | 1.4% |