Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability Age 5 to 17
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability Age 5 to 17
Disability Age 5 to 17 Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
4.9%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,824,521 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,554,818 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.731 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 12.9%.
Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 0.55% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 22.2% |
Range | 13.6% | 19.8% |
Mean | 4.8% | 7.1% |
Median | 4.3% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 5 to 17
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Taiwanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Japan (4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Lebanon (4.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Serbia (4.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Nepal (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), South African (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Hawaiian (5.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (5.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
Ute | 80.6 /100 | #152 | Excellent 5.5% |
Ecuadorians | 79.7 /100 | #153 | Good 5.5% |
Australians | 78.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 78.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.5% |
Hawaiians | 78.0 /100 | #156 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 77.9 /100 | #157 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 77.1 /100 | #158 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 75.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.5% |
South Africans | 73.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 69.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.5% |
Zimbabweans | 67.2 /100 | #162 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 64.0 /100 | #163 | Good 5.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 61.9 /100 | #164 | Good 5.6% |
Lebanese | 61.4 /100 | #165 | Good 5.6% |
Greeks | 60.6 /100 | #166 | Good 5.6% |