Cajun Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cajun
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Cajun Single Female Poverty
30.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,582,163 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 30.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.4% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Cajuns and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Cajuns influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Cajuns simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.81%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 1.0%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |
Cajun Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.029% | 6.8% |
| Maximum | 25.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.4% | 93.2% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 40.8% |
| Median | 4.8% | 39.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 29.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 50.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 21.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 16.5% |
Correlation Details
| Cajun Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.029% | 130,461,117 | 22.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 8,758,212 | 22.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 3,326,390 | 26.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,217,555 | 30.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 812,788 | 23.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 677,798 | 28.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 490,243 | 27.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 373,106 | 26.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 331,440 | 35.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 153,348 | 33.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 138,380 | 26.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 174,374 | 27.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 124,372 | 38.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 77,366 | 44.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 148,143 | 39.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 176,850 | 32.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 131,325 | 35.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 46,990 | 28.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 70,674 | 32.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 79,335 | 37.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 115,162 | 26.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 51,523 | 41.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 5,440 | 60.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 38,497 | 30.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 99,888 | 41.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 115,209 | 41.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 57,173 | 44.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 538 | 40.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 4,800 | 34.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 16,526 | 46.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 29,975 | 40.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 6,498 | 37.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 27,050 | 47.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 1,347 | 45.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 11,006 | 37.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 6,507 | 34.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 19,497 | 30.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 8,745 | 16.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.38% | 2,474 | 33.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 4,162 | 45.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 6,659 | 53.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 7,606 | 50.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.03% | 9,639 | 60.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 6,094 | 23.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 16,937 | 55.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.90% | 9,823 | 58.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 11,726 | 59.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 31,076 | 55.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.47% | 5,579 | 59.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 1,584 | 79.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.05% | 3,069 | 14.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.32% | 2,633 | 8.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.50% | 13,329 | 49.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 885 | 21.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29% | 915 | 69.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.43% | 23,891 | 43.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.64% | 1,473 | 50.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.76% | 1,445 | 75.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.18% | 855 | 61.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 1,518 | 50.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.69% | 8,271 | 30.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.71% | 1,223 | 30.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.06% | 5,423 | 43.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.01% | 2,215 | 6.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.55% | 1,147 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.06% | 9,326 | 42.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.92% | 1,220 | 60.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.57% | 3,338 | 60.6% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.47% | 1,441 | 47.9% |