Lumbee Disability Age Over 75
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Disability Age Over 75
Lumbee Disability Age Over 75
56.2%
DISABILITY | AGE OVER 75
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,131,949 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 56.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.43% in percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Disability Age Over 75
In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Houma (56.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Pueblo (55.9%, a difference of 0.67%), Pima (55.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Tohono O'odham (56.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and Colville (55.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Over 75 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 53.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 54.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 54.2% |
| Immigrants from Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 54.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 54.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 55.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 55.8% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 55.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 56.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 56.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 56.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 58.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 58.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 59.2% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 61.1% |
Lumbee Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Disability Age Over 75 Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 13.8% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 84.9% | 86.2% |
| Mean | 21.0% | 60.7% |
| Median | 11.2% | 58.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 50.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 70.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.7% | 20.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 20.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 20.2% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age Over 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,320,575 | 48.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 49.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 53.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 120,266 | 54.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,297 | 49.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 46.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 47.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 59.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 58.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 59.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.09% | 5,911 | 61.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 77.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 41.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 78.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 56.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.85% | 1,324 | 55.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 66.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 54.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 67.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.68% | 186 | 13.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 53.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 51.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 54.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 57.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 71.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 16.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 79.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 65.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 29.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 56.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 74.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 100.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 50.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 55.7% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 100.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 59.9% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 62.3% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 18.8% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 83.3% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 69.6% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 69.5% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 100.0% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 59.8% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 100.0% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 100.0% |