Lumbee Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Lumbee Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
19.7%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 75
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,707,280 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.52% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Dominican (19.6%, a difference of 0.66%), Immigrants from Cuba (19.9%, a difference of 0.79%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (20.1%, a difference of 1.6%), Navajo (19.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Tohono O'odham (19.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 23.9% |
Lumbee Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Data |
| Minimum | 0.040% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 64.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.2% | 98.0% |
| Mean | 17.7% | 29.1% |
| Median | 10.5% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.5% | 32.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.4% | 25.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.2% | 25.2% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.040% | 89,939,521 | 13.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,096,292 | 14.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 216,631 | 14.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 118,759 | 13.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 76,403 | 10.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 9,477 | 16.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 8,119 | 6.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 9,277 | 17.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 3,995 | 23.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 9.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.09% | 5,634 | 26.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 18.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 9.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,753 | 15.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 79.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 33.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 29.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 5.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.68% | 186 | 61.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 26.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 6.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 16.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 22.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.88% | 3,446 | 23.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 2.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 37.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 25.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 16.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 34.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 100.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 50.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 17.4% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 100.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 23.0% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 45.7% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 16.7% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 28.5% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 32.1% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 100.0% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 20.3% |