Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Disability Age 35 to 64
Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64
17.6%
DISABILITY | AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,257,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 17.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee Data | Disability Age 35 to 64 Data |
Minimum | 0.041% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 84.9% | 48.5% |
Range | 84.9% | 44.2% |
Mean | 21.0% | 22.1% |
Median | 10.6% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.8% | 25.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.7% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 7.7% |
Correlation Details
Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,445,489 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 15.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 19.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 120,266 | 18.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,420 | 21.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 20.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 21.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 20.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 21.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 24.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 30.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 28.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 24.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 21.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 18.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 1,417 | 7.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 21.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 21.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 25.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 906 | 29.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 19.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 18.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 19.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 18.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 28.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 10.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 48.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 16.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 4.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 15.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 28.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 23.4% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 10.5% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 24.5% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 19.8% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 23.1% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 32.2% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 24.4% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 19.7% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 37.4% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 23.9% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 28.9% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 31.0% |