Lumbee Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Hearing Disability
Lumbee Hearing Disability
4.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,274,524 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 4.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in percentage of population with hearing disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and percentage of population with hearing disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with hearing disability within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with hearing disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Osage (4.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Apache (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Seminole (4.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and Paiute (4.1%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 4.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 4.0% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 4.0% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 4.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 4.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Lumbee Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee Data | Hearing Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.041% | 0.45% |
Maximum | 81.5% | 9.7% |
Range | 81.5% | 9.2% |
Mean | 19.5% | 4.9% |
Median | 10.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.6% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.4% | 1.8% |
Correlation Details
Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Hearing Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,463,015 | 2.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 4.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 4.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 120,266 | 4.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,297 | 4.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 4.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 5.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 5.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 6.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 5.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 7.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 7.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 4.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 5.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 4.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 2.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 0.45% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 3.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 3.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 906 | 9.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 4.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 2.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 5.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 4.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 6.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 2.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 5.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 5.4% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 1.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 4.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 5.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 5.1% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 8.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 4.3% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 5.4% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 4.7% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 4.4% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 5.2% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 9.7% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 6.5% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 5.1% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 5.7% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 4.6% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 4.9% |