Armenian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Armenian Female Poverty
13.2%
POVERTY | FEMALES
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,749,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 13.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Armenians and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Armenians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Armenians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Armenian Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.098% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 43.5% | 26.9% |
| Range | 43.4% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 12.6% |
| Median | 9.6% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 5.5% |
Correlation Details
| Armenian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.098% | 270,231,978 | 13.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 23,649,127 | 10.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 5,337,192 | 9.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 2,933,785 | 12.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 852,777 | 10.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 4,859,323 | 16.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 516,622 | 12.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 505,106 | 11.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 111,744 | 11.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 259,339 | 18.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 26,366 | 5.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 69,133 | 9.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.45% | 111,621 | 8.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.87% | 30,109 | 11.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 90,874 | 15.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 108,197 | 11.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 88,797 | 6.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.80% | 60,345 | 22.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.86% | 44,244 | 7.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 20,092 | 7.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76% | 7,344 | 16.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.54% | 72,421 | 9.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 145,227 | 12.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.42% | 43,893 | 20.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.83% | 865 | 5.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.62% | 51,654 | 19.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.28% | 133 | 4.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.69% | 32,827 | 5.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.08% | 650 | 4.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 27,523 | 10.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 2,038 | 26.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 20,911 | 5.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.10% | 310 | 21.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.46% | 8,209 | 16.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.65% | 429 | 2.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.65% | 12,312 | 16.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.00% | 72 | 21.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 45,564 | 13.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.98% | 15,377 | 7.7% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.43% | 226 | 20.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.71% | 18,951 | 12.3% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.78% | 16,679 | 16.2% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.51% | 194,512 | 14.4% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.93% | 32,294 | 14.2% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.12% | 35,755 | 21.9% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.33% | 11,091 | 6.8% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.51% | 22,831 | 14.0% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.52% | 22,163 | 14.3% |