British Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
British Female Poverty
12.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,738,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 12.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.75% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of British and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of British influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if British simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to British by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.7% | 97.3% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 18.5% |
| Median | 13.9% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 18.1% |
Correlation Details
| British Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 285,507,955 | 15.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 172,131,189 | 12.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 49,782,657 | 11.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 13,955,970 | 9.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 4,945,507 | 10.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 2,063,845 | 8.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 776,242 | 9.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74% | 641,818 | 6.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 357,687 | 7.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 144,918 | 11.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.29% | 77,288 | 12.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 52,287 | 9.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 52,601 | 13.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 49,013 | 10.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 42,596 | 8.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.73% | 34,070 | 13.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.19% | 37,646 | 7.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 19,110 | 15.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.24% | 12,158 | 11.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 4,905 | 12.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.29% | 11,224 | 15.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.83% | 8,938 | 13.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.09% | 2,497 | 21.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 3,692 | 17.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22% | 442 | 11.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.72% | 2,547 | 10.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.22% | 4,174 | 15.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.88% | 497 | 11.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 3,003 | 11.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.74% | 699 | 33.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.18% | 257 | 11.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.78% | 2,478 | 15.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.09% | 988 | 5.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.83% | 303 | 13.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.29% | 133 | 64.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.65% | 153 | 6.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.33% | 884 | 16.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.66% | 568 | 3.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.08% | 1,242 | 2.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.87% | 393 | 25.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.91% | 178 | 16.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.17% | 442 | 33.7% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.15% | 265 | 19.4% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.24% | 282 | 14.2% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16% | 243 | 23.5% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.91% | 455 | 15.3% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.33% | 60 | 72.4% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.81% | 185 | 51.1% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.20% | 125 | 51.8% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.89% | 1,063 | 5.0% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.29% | 51 | 10.8% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.46% | 39 | 3.6% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.55% | 287 | 13.0% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.83% | 69 | 45.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 9 | 100.0% |