Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Slavic Female Poverty
12.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.1% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Slavs and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Slavs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Slavs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.050% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 32.5% | 46.6% |
| Range | 32.4% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 12.0% |
| Median | 4.1% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 8.0% |
Correlation Details
| Slavic Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.050% | 241,066,448 | 13.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 19,807,194 | 11.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 5,277,015 | 11.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 1,937,260 | 11.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,065,913 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 514,181 | 10.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 279,055 | 10.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 264,815 | 11.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 146,866 | 10.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 135,418 | 8.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 42,104 | 10.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 43,945 | 8.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 36,670 | 6.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 19,784 | 14.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 36,891 | 8.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 3,724 | 14.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 5,818 | 5.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 23,398 | 11.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.05% | 3,539 | 5.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 12,150 | 6.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 2,807 | 13.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 3,571 | 9.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 3,184 | 8.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 4,404 | 10.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.02% | 722 | 5.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 290 | 8.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 2,910 | 0.21% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 691 | 7.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 2,194 | 3.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 970 | 4.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 2,536 | 9.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 595 | 16.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 686 | 16.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 526 | 16.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 498 | 20.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.25% | 304 | 13.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 702 | 24.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 150 | 3.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 2,493 | 2.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 768 | 17.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.61% | 197 | 6.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 149 | 2.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35% | 1,251 | 10.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.48% | 306 | 12.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.62% | 291 | 23.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.85% | 132 | 12.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 267 | 22.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.56% | 398 | 12.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.49% | 703 | 36.2% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.46% | 422 | 46.6% |