Comanche Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Comanche Female Poverty
16.2%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,749,855 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.65% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Comanche and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Comanche influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Comanche simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants from Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants from Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
Comanche Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche Data | Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.034% | 8.4% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 60.0% |
Range | 33.3% | 51.6% |
Mean | 7.9% | 20.0% |
Median | 5.8% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 10.3% |
Correlation Details
Comanche Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 108,054,008 | 15.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 1,132,107 | 16.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 165,510 | 15.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 63,039 | 13.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 37,119 | 17.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 19,143 | 10.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 159,813 | 17.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 35,040 | 18.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 6,885 | 15.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 25,958 | 18.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.11% | 1,654 | 30.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 4,145 | 15.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 4,986 | 10.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.52% | 9,326 | 25.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 2,994 | 27.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 6,086 | 33.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 2,520 | 36.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.49% | 3,230 | 25.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29% | 312 | 8.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.83% | 2,563 | 21.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 49 | 22.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.52% | 4,867 | 12.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99% | 1,438 | 17.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.26% | 1,377 | 17.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.27% | 1,341 | 9.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.87% | 2,974 | 16.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.46% | 1,065 | 19.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.49% | 288 | 8.8% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 18 | 60.0% |