Iroquois vs European Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
European
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Europeans
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs European Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,757,214 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 28.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | European |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 95.3% | 98.1% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 22.2% |
| Median | 16.7% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 20.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 20.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |