Laotian In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Laotian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 45-54
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
62.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,742,074 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.376 and weighted average of 82.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.76% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Laotians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 within an area, or if Laotians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Laotians by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are South American Indian (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Haitian (82.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Dutch (82.8%, a difference of 0.010%), German Russian (82.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Austria (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 70.6 /100 | #153 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Ghana | 70.3 /100 | #154 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Philippines | 69.0 /100 | #155 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 68.8 /100 | #156 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Australia | 68.2 /100 | #157 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe | 67.8 /100 | #158 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Austria | 64.6 /100 | #159 | Good 82.9% |
Laotians | 62.8 /100 | #160 | Good 82.9% |
South American Indians | 62.2 /100 | #161 | Good 82.9% |
Haitians | 61.8 /100 | #162 | Good 82.8% |
Dutch | 61.7 /100 | #163 | Good 82.8% |
German Russians | 61.3 /100 | #164 | Good 82.8% |
Immigrants from Sudan | 59.9 /100 | #165 | Average 82.8% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 57.4 /100 | #166 | Average 82.8% |
Swiss | 56.5 /100 | #167 | Average 82.8% |
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian Data | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Data |
Minimum | 0.051% | 56.5% |
Maximum | 26.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.9% | 43.5% |
Mean | 4.3% | 80.6% |
Median | 2.8% | 82.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 77.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 84.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 10.5% |
Correlation Details
Laotian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.051% | 165,537,281 | 82.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 36,350,943 | 83.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 10,240,605 | 83.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 5,490,936 | 83.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,241,235 | 82.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 2,036,833 | 84.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 813,243 | 82.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 619,038 | 83.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 173,984 | 90.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 212,886 | 78.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 162,834 | 82.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 158,717 | 83.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 18,184 | 83.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 235,830 | 83.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 45,829 | 81.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 112,979 | 84.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 59,281 | 82.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 44,033 | 88.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 19,031 | 77.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 9,634 | 79.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 12,809 | 87.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 50,944 | 80.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 1,246 | 81.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 6,414 | 64.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 2,466 | 81.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 12,478 | 70.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 1,304 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 890 | 63.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 4,150 | 89.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 2,123 | 58.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 26,556 | 82.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 1,692 | 97.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 1,392 | 85.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 722 | 68.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 2,052 | 75.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 23,842 | 83.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 619 | 97.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 2,756 | 61.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 236 | 76.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 84 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.94% | 1,634 | 96.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 1,220 | 56.5% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.91% | 566 | 62.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.97% | 543 | 62.9% |