Laotian Disability Age Over 75
COMPARE
Laotian
Select to Compare
Disability Age Over 75
Laotian Disability Age Over 75
47.9%
DISABILITY | AGE OVER 75
11.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,625,451 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 47.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.89% in percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Laotians and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Laotians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 within an area, or if Laotians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Disability Age Over 75
In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (47.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Vietnamese (47.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Panamanian (47.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Barbados (47.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Senegalese (47.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Over 75 |
Jamaicans | 19.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 47.7% |
Immigrants from Syria | 17.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 47.8% |
Immigrants from Senegal | 16.9 /100 | #208 | Poor 47.8% |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 14.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 47.8% |
Vietnamese | 11.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 47.9% |
Panamanians | 11.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 47.9% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 11.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 47.9% |
Laotians | 11.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 47.9% |
Immigrants from Barbados | 10.7 /100 | #214 | Poor 47.9% |
Senegalese | 10.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 47.9% |
Immigrants from Panama | 10.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 47.9% |
Immigrants from Grenada | 9.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 47.9% |
Immigrants from Western Africa | 8.3 /100 | #218 | Tragic 48.0% |
Immigrants from Western Asia | 7.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 48.0% |
Bahamians | 7.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 48.0% |
Laotian Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian Data | Disability Age Over 75 Data |
Minimum | 0.051% | 29.3% |
Maximum | 26.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.9% | 70.7% |
Mean | 4.4% | 53.5% |
Median | 2.9% | 47.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 43.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 58.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 16.8% |
Correlation Details
Laotian Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age Over 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.051% | 165,458,720 | 47.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 36,348,685 | 47.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 10,223,313 | 46.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 5,489,750 | 48.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,240,152 | 46.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 2,033,787 | 48.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 810,502 | 48.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 620,543 | 47.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 173,984 | 44.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 208,791 | 53.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 162,834 | 43.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 158,717 | 41.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 18,184 | 54.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 235,830 | 51.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 45,933 | 45.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 112,679 | 47.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 52,206 | 44.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 44,033 | 59.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 19,031 | 69.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 9,634 | 53.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 12,514 | 55.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 51,720 | 41.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 1,246 | 40.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 6,249 | 82.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 2,466 | 34.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 12,478 | 66.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 1,304 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 398 | 38.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 4,150 | 32.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 2,123 | 68.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 26,556 | 51.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 1,692 | 85.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 1,392 | 29.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 722 | 44.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 2,052 | 35.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.97% | 23,104 | 56.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.58% | 319 | 35.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 619 | 81.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 2,756 | 80.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 236 | 75.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 84 | 46.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.94% | 1,634 | 51.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 1,220 | 39.4% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.91% | 566 | 42.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.97% | 543 | 100.0% |