Tohono O'odham In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tohono O'odham In Labor Force | Age > 16
57.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,725,311 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.613 and weighted average of 57.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.31% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tohono O'odham influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Tohono O'odham simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Pima (57.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Lumbee (56.8%, a difference of 0.85%), Yuman (57.8%, a difference of 0.99%), Navajo (56.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and Puerto Rican (58.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 60.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 60.6% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 59.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 59.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 59.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 59.3% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 58.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 58.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 57.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 57.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 57.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 56.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 56.6% |
Tohono O'odham In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.034% | 12.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 82.3% |
| Range | 100.0% | 69.5% |
| Mean | 30.9% | 50.1% |
| Median | 10.8% | 56.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.3% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 65.5% | 22.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.2% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.6% | 17.4% |
Correlation Details
| Tohono O'odham Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 56,797,105 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 1,357,108 | 61.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 386,792 | 57.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,171 | 54.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 11,962 | 59.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 56,832 | 59.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 7,515 | 69.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 1,835 | 57.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 1,178 | 56.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 1,824 | 43.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 965 | 49.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 5,820 | 56.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 733 | 65.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 7,685 | 47.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.57% | 2,403 | 62.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.81% | 148 | 12.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 454 | 62.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.02% | 394 | 82.3% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.52% | 3,621 | 44.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.96% | 392 | 70.3% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.26% | 2,021 | 66.3% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.62% | 21 | 66.7% |
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.45% | 918 | 38.9% |
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.32% | 88 | 13.6% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.20% | 314 | 37.1% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.94% | 8,434 | 40.1% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.33% | 204 | 26.9% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.67% | 353 | 43.3% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.12% | 882 | 18.9% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.37% | 187 | 19.2% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 952 | 43.9% |