Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,520,725 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.717 and weighted average of 65.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.64% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Oceania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Oceania influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Immigrants from Oceania simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants from China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.11% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 87.8% | 86.8% |
| Range | 87.7% | 77.7% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 59.8% |
| Median | 7.9% | 63.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 54.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 66.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 15.2% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Oceania Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 281,297,426 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 14,223,772 | 66.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 4,771,824 | 67.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 2,254,835 | 66.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 825,521 | 67.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 510,963 | 64.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 639,446 | 64.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 184,131 | 64.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 261,846 | 62.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 83,390 | 64.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 81,480 | 60.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 208,937 | 64.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.43% | 42,814 | 62.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 4,433 | 65.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 6,901 | 56.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 6,156 | 50.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 63,455 | 69.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 15,342 | 52.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.06% | 7,392 | 50.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.45% | 5,221 | 53.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.07% | 1,091 | 63.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.32% | 719 | 49.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 2,174 | 55.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 4,214 | 65.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.67% | 1,059 | 48.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 1,858 | 54.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.20% | 41 | 86.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.33% | 73 | 83.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.94% | 7,236 | 67.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.36% | 5,411 | 68.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 102 | 41.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 198 | 83.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.76% | 693 | 63.8% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.16% | 398 | 63.2% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.66% | 99 | 9.1% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.84% | 74 | 12.2% |