Immigrants from Laos Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Laos Single Female Poverty
22.9%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,096,236 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 22.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.70% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Laos and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Laos influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Laos simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants from Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants from Laos Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Laos Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.032% | 5.4% |
Maximum | 11.6% | 54.3% |
Range | 11.5% | 48.9% |
Mean | 3.4% | 27.8% |
Median | 2.8% | 26.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 34.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 10.2% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Laos Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 129,695,996 | 21.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 29,854,888 | 19.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 14,732,527 | 20.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 7,018,265 | 20.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 4,101,936 | 23.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 2,706,041 | 20.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 2,683,109 | 22.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 1,234,191 | 22.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,255,241 | 21.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 806,580 | 23.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 440,286 | 21.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 1,187,014 | 21.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 524,247 | 28.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 365,286 | 22.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,103,871 | 29.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.50% | 107,002 | 23.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 100,924 | 22.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 173,826 | 35.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 173,806 | 26.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 134,992 | 22.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 261,606 | 23.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 60,439 | 25.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 67,210 | 29.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 66,955 | 31.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 72,249 | 28.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 69,767 | 22.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 53,286 | 41.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 337,411 | 27.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 56,927 | 24.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 76,140 | 26.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 8,566 | 30.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 32,651 | 33.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 32 | 33.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 92,651 | 35.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 3,841 | 36.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 9,310 | 54.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 2,433 | 45.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 70,364 | 35.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 789 | 47.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 41,405 | 21.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 140,402 | 21.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 34,220 | 15.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 14,787 | 11.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 2,984 | 34.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 1,003 | 29.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 2,595 | 34.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.15% | 4,332 | 5.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 5,291 | 51.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 17,716 | 8.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 57,662 | 26.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 991 | 41.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.35% | 2,819 | 16.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 19,613 | 41.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 1,900 | 35.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,207 | 17.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 216 | 45.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 1,693 | 30.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.93% | 1,218 | 6.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.57% | 527 | 40.0% |