Immigrants from Laos Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Laos Family Households
65.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,468,256 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332 and weighted average of 65.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.69% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Laos influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Laos simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Caribbean (65.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Haiti (65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Crow (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Hopi (65.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants from Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants from Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants from Haiti | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 99.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants from Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants from Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants from Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants from Laos Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Laos Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.032% | 37.2% |
Maximum | 31.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.9% | 62.8% |
Mean | 4.8% | 69.0% |
Median | 3.5% | 66.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 63.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 74.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 10.2% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Laos Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 130,101,065 | 63.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 30,172,422 | 66.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 14,854,843 | 64.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 7,156,471 | 66.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 4,164,515 | 61.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 2,767,490 | 67.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 2,713,771 | 65.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 1,289,060 | 68.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,256,502 | 66.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 832,665 | 68.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 449,931 | 70.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 1,199,877 | 63.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 547,455 | 66.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 394,922 | 65.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,113,467 | 66.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.50% | 107,002 | 61.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 100,924 | 62.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 177,331 | 59.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 183,442 | 63.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 140,535 | 70.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 262,666 | 63.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 66,031 | 68.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 67,210 | 56.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 77,659 | 66.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 74,457 | 73.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 69,767 | 65.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 63,958 | 72.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 337,411 | 53.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 56,927 | 66.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 77,618 | 74.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 8,566 | 71.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 32,651 | 72.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 290 | 37.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 92,651 | 75.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 4,591 | 86.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 9,310 | 77.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 2,433 | 65.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 70,364 | 58.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 1,003 | 59.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 41,405 | 61.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 146,187 | 70.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 34,220 | 60.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 802 | 87.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 958 | 79.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 14,787 | 74.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 2,984 | 64.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 1,003 | 84.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 5,134 | 63.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.15% | 4,332 | 80.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 5,291 | 79.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 244 | 64.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 17,716 | 79.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 106 | 88.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 57,662 | 62.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 991 | 70.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 3,208 | 64.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 19,613 | 65.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 1,900 | 68.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 43 | 58.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 153 | 78.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.27% | 55 | 71.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,207 | 64.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 216 | 62.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.65% | 1,052 | 84.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 1,172 | 86.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 1,693 | 64.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.93% | 1,218 | 63.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 564 | 80.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 570 | 75.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.86% | 619 | 96.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.49% | 734 | 56.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.23% | 26 | 50.0% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.88% | 138 | 100.0% |