Immigrants from Laos Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Select to Compare
Disability Age 65 to 74
Immigrants from Laos Disability Age 65 to 74
26.1%
DISABILITY | AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,426,016 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 26.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.91% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Laos influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 within an area, or if Immigrants from Laos simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Micronesia (26.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (26.2%, a difference of 0.10%), African (26.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Congo (26.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from the Azores (26.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 25.9% |
Immigrants from Honduras | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 25.9% |
Delaware | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 25.9% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 25.9% |
Immigrants from the Azores | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants from Laos | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 26.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 26.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 26.2% |
Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 26.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 26.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 26.6% |
Immigrants from Central America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 26.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants from Laos Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Laos Data | Disability Age 65 to 74 Data |
Minimum | 0.032% | 8.3% |
Maximum | 19.2% | 75.0% |
Range | 19.2% | 66.7% |
Mean | 4.2% | 31.1% |
Median | 3.2% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 38.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 12.7% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Laos Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 130,101,065 | 24.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 30,162,392 | 23.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 14,843,330 | 24.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 7,156,471 | 23.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 4,159,889 | 25.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 2,767,490 | 25.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 2,713,771 | 25.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 1,289,060 | 26.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,256,502 | 25.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 829,971 | 24.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 449,931 | 26.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 1,197,755 | 26.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 545,580 | 27.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 394,922 | 26.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,112,750 | 30.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.50% | 107,002 | 34.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 100,924 | 23.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 177,331 | 38.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 183,442 | 27.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 140,535 | 30.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 262,666 | 29.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 66,031 | 32.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 67,210 | 28.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 75,649 | 35.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 74,457 | 32.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 69,767 | 21.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 63,958 | 44.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 337,411 | 23.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 56,927 | 30.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 76,140 | 38.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 8,566 | 40.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 32,651 | 42.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 258 | 14.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 92,651 | 33.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 4,530 | 53.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 8,580 | 44.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 2,433 | 25.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 70,364 | 33.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 1,003 | 36.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 41,405 | 22.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 146,187 | 29.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 34,220 | 26.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 802 | 27.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 14,787 | 40.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 2,984 | 52.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 5,134 | 51.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.15% | 4,332 | 13.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 5,291 | 40.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 244 | 18.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 17,716 | 18.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 106 | 23.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.06% | 57,662 | 30.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 991 | 16.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 3,208 | 22.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 19,613 | 42.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 1,900 | 29.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 43 | 40.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 153 | 44.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,207 | 17.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 216 | 22.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 1,172 | 25.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 1,693 | 59.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.93% | 1,218 | 8.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 564 | 18.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.63% | 43 | 75.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.49% | 734 | 10.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.23% | 26 | 75.0% |