South American vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Turks
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,269,778 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 30.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 14.8% | 16.2% |
| Range | 13.6% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 4.6% |
| Median | 5.8% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Sudanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Subsaharan African (5.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
| South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |