Mongolian vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Turks
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,875,395 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 16.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 14.5% | 16.2% |
| Range | 14.1% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 4.6% |
| Median | 4.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Spain (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |