Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Community & Social Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in North Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service  in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Edmore62.5%10.3%(+52.2)#111.2%(+51.3)#108
2.Warwick60.4%10.3%(+50.1)#211.2%(+49.2)#113
3.Sutton54.5%10.3%(+44.2)#311.2%(+43.3)#160
4.Foxholm51.7%10.3%(+41.4)#411.2%(+40.5)#172
5.Haynes48.0%10.3%(+37.7)#511.2%(+36.8)#227
6.Montpelier46.3%10.3%(+36.0)#611.2%(+35.1)#247
7.Glenfield43.1%10.3%(+32.8)#711.2%(+31.9)#302
8.Osnabrock39.6%10.3%(+29.2)#811.2%(+28.4)#359
9.Leith38.1%10.3%(+27.8)#911.2%(+26.9)#392
10.Brooktree Park35.2%10.3%(+24.8)#1011.2%(+24.0)#492
11.Belcourt34.5%10.3%(+24.2)#1111.2%(+23.3)#519
12.Havana33.3%10.3%(+23.0)#1211.2%(+22.1)#563
13.Balta33.3%10.3%(+23.0)#1311.2%(+22.1)#566
14.Oberon33.3%10.3%(+23.0)#1411.2%(+22.1)#567
15.Leal33.3%10.3%(+23.0)#1511.2%(+22.1)#576
16.Shell Valley31.4%10.3%(+21.1)#1611.2%(+20.2)#665
17.Binford29.6%10.3%(+19.2)#1711.2%(+18.4)#788
18.Minnewaukan27.5%10.3%(+17.2)#1811.2%(+16.3)#949
19.Pingree27.5%10.3%(+17.2)#1911.2%(+16.3)#953
20.Mantador27.3%10.3%(+16.9)#2011.2%(+16.1)#980
21.Fort Yates26.7%10.3%(+16.3)#2111.2%(+15.5)#1,041
22.Selz25.8%10.3%(+15.5)#2211.2%(+14.6)#1,126
23.Solen25.0%10.3%(+14.7)#2311.2%(+13.8)#1,225
24.Maddock23.9%10.3%(+13.5)#2411.2%(+12.7)#1,418
25.Dahlen23.8%10.3%(+13.5)#2511.2%(+12.6)#1,436
26.Manning22.7%10.3%(+12.4)#2611.2%(+11.5)#1,666
27.Gardena22.2%10.3%(+11.9)#2711.2%(+11.0)#1,782
28.Monango22.2%10.3%(+11.9)#2811.2%(+11.0)#1,786
29.Rogers21.2%10.3%(+10.9)#2911.2%(+10.00)#2,007
30.Rugby19.8%10.3%(+9.46)#3011.2%(+8.60)#2,479
31.Grand Forks Afb19.6%10.3%(+9.28)#3111.2%(+8.41)#2,545
32.Lakota19.5%10.3%(+9.16)#3211.2%(+8.29)#2,603
33.Lignite19.5%10.3%(+9.14)#3311.2%(+8.27)#2,613
34.Hope19.4%10.3%(+9.08)#3411.2%(+8.21)#2,632
35.Rolette19.2%10.3%(+8.86)#3511.2%(+7.99)#2,718
36.Mchenry19.0%10.3%(+8.70)#3611.2%(+7.83)#2,777
37.Hurdsfield18.8%10.3%(+8.40)#3711.2%(+7.54)#2,908
38.Perth17.6%10.3%(+7.30)#3811.2%(+6.43)#3,439
39.Steele17.4%10.3%(+7.01)#3911.2%(+6.14)#3,609
40.New Rockford17.2%10.3%(+6.88)#4011.2%(+6.01)#3,678
41.Leeds17.2%10.3%(+6.82)#4111.2%(+5.95)#3,712
42.Walcott16.8%10.3%(+6.43)#4211.2%(+5.56)#3,932
43.Mooreton16.7%10.3%(+6.32)#4311.2%(+5.45)#4,010
44.Calvin16.7%10.3%(+6.32)#4411.2%(+5.45)#4,032
45.Tioga16.3%10.3%(+5.91)#4511.2%(+5.04)#4,306
46.North River15.8%10.3%(+5.44)#4611.2%(+4.58)#4,648
47.Napoleon15.8%10.3%(+5.43)#4711.2%(+4.56)#4,656
48.Flasher15.7%10.3%(+5.34)#4811.2%(+4.47)#4,723
49.Garrison15.4%10.3%(+5.02)#4911.2%(+4.15)#5,003
50.Grand Forks15.2%10.3%(+4.90)#5011.2%(+4.03)#5,094
51.Scranton15.2%10.3%(+4.87)#5111.2%(+4.00)#5,118
52.New Town15.0%10.3%(+4.67)#5211.2%(+3.80)#5,310
53.Zap14.8%10.3%(+4.41)#5311.2%(+3.54)#5,576
54.Velva14.7%10.3%(+4.35)#5411.2%(+3.48)#5,641
55.Park River14.5%10.3%(+4.14)#5511.2%(+3.27)#5,855
56.East Dunseith14.5%10.3%(+4.12)#5611.2%(+3.25)#5,875
57.Prairie Rose14.3%10.3%(+3.94)#5711.2%(+3.07)#6,102
58.Braddock14.3%10.3%(+3.94)#5811.2%(+3.07)#6,108
59.Dunseith14.2%10.3%(+3.89)#5911.2%(+3.02)#6,137
60.Medina14.1%10.3%(+3.72)#6011.2%(+2.85)#6,326
61.Reile S Acres14.0%10.3%(+3.66)#6111.2%(+2.79)#6,388
62.Golden Valley14.0%10.3%(+3.65)#6211.2%(+2.79)#6,398
63.Lamoure13.9%10.3%(+3.57)#6311.2%(+2.70)#6,487
64.Center13.9%10.3%(+3.51)#6411.2%(+2.64)#6,560
65.Christine13.6%10.3%(+3.25)#6511.2%(+2.38)#6,890
66.Harmon13.5%10.3%(+3.17)#6611.2%(+2.30)#6,980
67.Leonard13.3%10.3%(+2.99)#6711.2%(+2.12)#7,231
68.Dazey13.3%10.3%(+2.99)#6811.2%(+2.12)#7,239
69.Forbes13.3%10.3%(+2.99)#6911.2%(+2.12)#7,249
70.Parshall13.2%10.3%(+2.82)#7011.2%(+1.95)#7,471
71.Alexander13.2%10.3%(+2.81)#7111.2%(+1.94)#7,482
72.Stanley13.1%10.3%(+2.78)#7211.2%(+1.91)#7,535
73.Sheyenne13.1%10.3%(+2.75)#7311.2%(+1.88)#7,562
74.Bottineau13.1%10.3%(+2.74)#7411.2%(+1.87)#7,579
75.Hankinson13.1%10.3%(+2.71)#7511.2%(+1.84)#7,609
76.Cavalier13.0%10.3%(+2.66)#7611.2%(+1.79)#7,696
77.Gackle13.0%10.3%(+2.65)#7711.2%(+1.79)#7,701
78.Glen Ullin13.0%10.3%(+2.63)#7811.2%(+1.76)#7,732
79.Kensal12.9%10.3%(+2.60)#7911.2%(+1.74)#7,769
80.Crary12.7%10.3%(+2.38)#8011.2%(+1.51)#8,075
81.Mayville12.7%10.3%(+2.36)#8111.2%(+1.49)#8,107
82.Lidgerwood12.7%10.3%(+2.34)#8211.2%(+1.47)#8,131
83.Rhame12.7%10.3%(+2.33)#8311.2%(+1.46)#8,146
84.Oriska12.6%10.3%(+2.30)#8411.2%(+1.43)#8,207
85.Anamoose12.6%10.3%(+2.26)#8511.2%(+1.39)#8,256
86.Fort Totten12.5%10.3%(+2.15)#8611.2%(+1.29)#8,395
87.Lincoln12.4%10.3%(+2.09)#8711.2%(+1.22)#8,520
88.Mandaree12.4%10.3%(+2.01)#8811.2%(+1.14)#8,654
89.Thompson12.3%10.3%(+1.98)#8911.2%(+1.11)#8,710
90.Fordville12.3%10.3%(+1.96)#9011.2%(+1.09)#8,734
91.Buffalo12.3%10.3%(+1.96)#9111.2%(+1.09)#8,736
92.Turtle Lake12.3%10.3%(+1.94)#9211.2%(+1.07)#8,767
93.Arthur12.3%10.3%(+1.91)#9311.2%(+1.04)#8,801
94.Walhalla12.2%10.3%(+1.84)#9411.2%(+0.967)#8,913
95.Mcville12.1%10.3%(+1.79)#9511.2%(+0.925)#8,972
96.Adams11.9%10.3%(+1.56)#9611.2%(+0.691)#9,339
97.Harwood11.8%10.3%(+1.50)#9711.2%(+0.628)#9,421
98.Menoken11.8%10.3%(+1.42)#9811.2%(+0.550)#9,555
99.Minot11.8%10.3%(+1.41)#9911.2%(+0.544)#9,568
100.Valley City11.6%10.3%(+1.30)#10011.2%(+0.434)#9,758

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in North Dakota are:
#1
62.5%
#2
60.4%
#3
54.5%
#4
51.7%
#5
48.0%
#6
46.3%
#7
43.1%
#8
39.6%
#9
38.1%
#10
35.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in North Dakota?
Edmore has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in North Dakota with 62.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in North Dakota is 10.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States is 11.2%.