Latvian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Latvian
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Latvian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
9.5%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,200,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 9.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.77% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Latvians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Latvians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Latvians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Czechoslovakian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 48.0% |
| Range | 14.3% | 46.0% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 10.5% |
| Median | 2.3% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.0% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 7.3% |
Correlation Details
| Latvian Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 161,386,496 | 11.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 37,499,562 | 9.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 10,056,946 | 8.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,556,211 | 8.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 2,601,296 | 7.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 1,341,746 | 7.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 586,470 | 8.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 608,869 | 6.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 461,863 | 9.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 279,826 | 7.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 188,307 | 7.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 77,512 | 9.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 113,077 | 9.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 76,776 | 5.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 99,719 | 6.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 10,507 | 9.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 30,297 | 8.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 5,685 | 6.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 10,505 | 9.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,688 | 10.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 11,493 | 13.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 47,136 | 9.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 3,206 | 6.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,516 | 6.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 4,502 | 2.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 10,001 | 14.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 8,848 | 5.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 13,973 | 7.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 1,445 | 20.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 1,430 | 20.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 20,529 | 3.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 2,740 | 8.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 1,120 | 4.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 1,745 | 6.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 1,392 | 5.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 13,497 | 4.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 3,575 | 7.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 2,010 | 25.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 133 | 12.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 8,425 | 2.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 162 | 11.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 188 | 10.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 402 | 2.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 732 | 21.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 811 | 15.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74% | 187 | 9.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 1,472 | 4.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 2,036 | 3.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 220 | 23.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 1,091 | 14.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 302 | 26.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 300 | 17.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 159 | 14.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 774 | 6.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 126 | 8.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 4,611 | 8.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 223 | 7.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 771 | 18.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 449 | 13.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 2,313 | 8.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 390 | 48.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 94 | 4.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.32% | 1,990 | 8.0% |