Immigrants from Costa Rica In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Immigrants from Costa Rica In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,275,671 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 65.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.42% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Costa Rica and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Costa Rica influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Immigrants from Costa Rica simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.037% | 47.1% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 80.1% |
| Range | 20.0% | 33.0% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 64.3% |
| Median | 2.5% | 65.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 61.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 67.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.5% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Costa Rica Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.037% | 161,394,961 | 65.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 25,343,999 | 65.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 8,018,996 | 64.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 3,473,044 | 64.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,722,322 | 66.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 1,206,712 | 64.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 989,147 | 64.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 405,752 | 65.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 381,481 | 64.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 236,557 | 63.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 232,111 | 65.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 121,883 | 65.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 218,784 | 67.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 59,681 | 66.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 54,045 | 64.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 5,324 | 64.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 72,628 | 68.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 4,589 | 60.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 28,521 | 63.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 52,938 | 69.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 9,266 | 59.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 26,624 | 64.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 11,166 | 74.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 13,417 | 61.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.43% | 329 | 52.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 24,748 | 69.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 2,661 | 52.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 45,949 | 67.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 33,541 | 69.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 3,138 | 67.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 98 | 52.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 4,791 | 62.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 19,759 | 57.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 5,226 | 56.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 1,760 | 69.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 923 | 54.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 657 | 65.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 1,539 | 67.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 479 | 66.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 2,714 | 47.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 501 | 59.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 8,287 | 62.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 1,519 | 71.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 14,789 | 72.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.29% | 318 | 50.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 11,906 | 74.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 167 | 80.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.49% | 569 | 66.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56% | 4,771 | 61.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.03% | 584 | 76.3% |