Ugandan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Ugandan
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Ugandan In Labor Force | Age > 16
67.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,069 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 67.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.32% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ugandans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ugandans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Ugandans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Africa (67.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (67.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Cambodian (67.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Zimbabwean (67.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uganda (67.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 67.6% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 67.6% |
| Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.6% |
| Immigrants from Kenya | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.6% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Ugandans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.3% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Ghanaians | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Ugandan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.016% | 42.9% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 91.4% |
| Range | 15.3% | 48.5% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 66.9% |
| Median | 1.5% | 66.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.68% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 69.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 7.4% |
Correlation Details
| Ugandan Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.016% | 81,499,766 | 66.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 6,235,645 | 66.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 2,313,261 | 66.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 1,403,388 | 67.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 576,211 | 65.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 564,431 | 69.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 258,146 | 67.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 194,870 | 71.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 253,519 | 70.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 114,417 | 66.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 123,600 | 64.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 39,941 | 62.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 27,519 | 74.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 18,170 | 65.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 163,767 | 66.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 44,208 | 65.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 13,516 | 67.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 49,074 | 73.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 5,682 | 65.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 238 | 60.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.99% | 604 | 70.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 1,049 | 66.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 14,202 | 66.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 9,019 | 62.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 1,010 | 42.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 16,145 | 61.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 34,536 | 70.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.30% | 6,426 | 68.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 2,274 | 59.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 1,210 | 61.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 26,684 | 73.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.00% | 180 | 57.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 2,900 | 83.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 316 | 91.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.90% | 1,303 | 65.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.32% | 842 | 64.3% |