Yugoslavian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Yugoslavian In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
81.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,722,501 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 65.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.28% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yugoslavians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yugoslavians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Yugoslavians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Czech (65.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (65.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Armenia (65.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants from China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
| Immigrants from Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants from Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
| Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 74.6 /100 | #159 | Good 65.3% |
Yugoslavian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.060% | 32.9% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 84.8% |
| Range | 39.4% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 61.4% |
| Median | 5.9% | 64.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 55.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 67.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 10.8% |
Correlation Details
| Yugoslavian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.060% | 239,069,612 | 65.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 27,877,402 | 65.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 8,633,670 | 65.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 3,570,912 | 65.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 2,194,573 | 67.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 1,093,510 | 64.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 753,790 | 67.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 391,529 | 63.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 389,870 | 67.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 374,706 | 64.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 269,257 | 62.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 195,748 | 66.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 116,196 | 68.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 164,492 | 66.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 44,297 | 65.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 28,373 | 64.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 51,411 | 65.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 85,120 | 66.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 5,070 | 54.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 8,180 | 53.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 11,563 | 58.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 32,592 | 75.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.47% | 12,554 | 68.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 6,609 | 70.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 10,984 | 64.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 71,284 | 67.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 22,286 | 72.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37% | 1,508 | 61.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 72 | 40.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 950 | 39.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 64,994 | 55.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 835 | 45.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 19,969 | 70.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.58% | 3,665 | 32.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.75% | 1,022 | 53.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 16,211 | 65.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 4,947 | 63.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.43% | 4,873 | 56.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.53% | 332 | 62.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.93% | 29,089 | 63.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 36,359 | 63.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 622 | 59.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.74% | 40,152 | 55.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 56 | 41.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.39% | 2,280 | 66.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.52% | 105 | 84.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 51 | 77.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.40% | 846 | 46.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.55% | 502 | 46.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.80% | 881 | 69.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.61% | 238 | 63.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.51% | 74 | 46.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.87% | 137 | 51.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.48% | 3,812 | 71.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.44% | 136 | 75.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 105 | 39.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.59% | 102 | 70.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.29% | 73 | 66.7% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.35% | 1,875 | 77.0% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.47% | 38 | 39.5% |