Yakama In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Yakama
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Yakama In Labor Force | Age > 16
62.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,879 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322 and weighted average of 62.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.16% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yakama and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yakama influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Yakama simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yakama by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Seminole (62.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Chickasaw (62.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |
Yakama In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.033% | 43.2% |
Maximum | 56.5% | 70.6% |
Range | 56.5% | 27.4% |
Mean | 9.6% | 58.5% |
Median | 4.4% | 59.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 53.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 63.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 7.0% |
Correlation Details
Yakama Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.033% | 19,058,180 | 66.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 567,932 | 62.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 83,410 | 63.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 71,755 | 62.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 12,799 | 53.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 6,858 | 51.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 14,006 | 64.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 44,079 | 61.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 6,405 | 56.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 1,768 | 59.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 659 | 48.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 2,920 | 58.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 1,078 | 58.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 569 | 59.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 3,153 | 62.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 11,112 | 63.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 205 | 43.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.54% | 199 | 44.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 13,015 | 63.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.64% | 220 | 65.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.38% | 1,195 | 63.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.87% | 640 | 67.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 120 | 70.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.73% | 13,145 | 59.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.67% | 172 | 53.4% |
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.39% | 1,724 | 48.8% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.51% | 561 | 50.1% |