Egyptian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Egyptian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age > 16
66.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,931,154 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 66.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.43% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Egyptians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Egyptians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Jordanian (66.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (66.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Egypt (66.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (66.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Venezuelan (66.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants from Peru | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Indonesians | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Sri Lankans | 99.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Egyptians | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Taiwanese | 99.7 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants from Korea | 99.7 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Egyptian Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.048% | 53.4% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 90.9% |
Range | 21.8% | 37.5% |
Mean | 4.8% | 67.8% |
Median | 3.4% | 66.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 65.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 69.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Correlation Details
Egyptian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.048% | 148,580,883 | 65.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 57,362,155 | 66.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 20,144,272 | 66.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 22,792,468 | 65.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 7,459,288 | 65.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 4,835,354 | 65.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 3,226,488 | 66.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 2,417,282 | 67.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 1,797,091 | 66.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 1,983,146 | 67.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 860,367 | 65.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 676,576 | 68.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 775,907 | 64.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 391,296 | 67.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 418,600 | 65.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 513,256 | 66.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 291,026 | 69.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 742,845 | 67.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 262,183 | 68.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 122,258 | 61.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 28,023 | 70.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 77,570 | 69.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 9,255 | 65.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 159,607 | 60.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 145,756 | 68.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 97,376 | 67.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 3,965 | 66.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 77,913 | 63.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 113,952 | 67.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 9,596 | 65.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 5,444 | 61.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 18,673 | 66.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 81 | 76.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 58,053 | 63.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 5,835 | 72.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 60,303 | 67.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 13,070 | 69.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 533 | 62.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 36,823 | 66.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 155 | 71.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 52,230 | 65.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 4,782 | 64.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 99,800 | 75.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.49% | 601 | 58.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 659 | 66.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 3,553 | 68.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 6,952 | 71.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 14,518 | 68.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.59% | 8,410 | 73.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 7,017 | 74.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 140,994 | 65.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 1,155 | 62.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 1,429 | 53.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 747 | 76.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.02% | 5,751 | 76.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.44% | 5,000 | 80.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.49% | 1,394 | 60.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.50% | 120 | 69.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 241 | 90.9% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.16% | 981 | 69.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.88% | 96 | 72.1% |