Haitian vs Creek Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Haitian
Creek
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Haitians
Creek
38.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
37.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Haitian vs Creek Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,356,790 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Haitians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 38.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,524,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 37.6%, a difference of 2.7%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Haitian | Creek |
Minimum | 18.8% | 7.7% |
Maximum | 69.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 50.9% | 92.3% |
Mean | 41.2% | 50.2% |
Median | 38.9% | 45.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.7% | 34.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.5% | 60.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 25.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 25.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 25.0% |
Demographics Similar to Haitians and Creek by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Haitians are Immigrants from West Indies (38.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (38.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Honduran (38.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Jamaican (38.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Dutch West Indian (38.4%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Central America (37.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alaskan Athabascan (37.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 38.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 38.5% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 38.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 38.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 38.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 38.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 38.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 38.8% |