Chilean vs Portuguese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chilean
Portuguese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chileans
Portuguese
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Portuguese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 438,899,993 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 48.3% | 45.2% |
| Range | 43.2% | 43.2% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 16.5% |
| Median | 13.8% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Portuguese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), English (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |