Colville Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Colville
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Colville Single Female Poverty
29.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,604,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388 and weighted average of 29.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.17% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Colville and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Colville influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Colville simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Colville by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Colville Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colville Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.026% | 16.7% |
| Maximum | 82.8% | 73.3% |
| Range | 82.8% | 56.6% |
| Mean | 25.8% | 34.2% |
| Median | 10.2% | 32.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.1% | 40.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 44.8% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.2% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.7% | 12.4% |
Correlation Details
| Colville Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.026% | 34,366,752 | 22.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 125,814 | 31.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 33,396 | 39.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 13,619 | 20.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 17,342 | 16.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 5,452 | 55.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 5,404 | 28.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 4,957 | 30.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 5,587 | 35.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.44% | 643 | 23.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 561 | 38.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.54% | 5,241 | 44.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 1,098 | 17.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.15% | 1,034 | 40.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.22% | 9,218 | 42.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.99% | 1,377 | 29.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 424 | 23.9% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.81% | 1,538 | 28.7% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.06% | 1,334 | 34.3% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.01% | 276 | 32.4% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.15% | 270 | 34.3% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.38% | 568 | 22.6% |
[ 64.5% - 65.0% ] 64.91% | 1,103 | 39.7% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.97% | 256 | 21.7% |
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.97% | 155 | 50.0% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.66% | 977 | 46.1% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.84% | 338 | 73.3% |