Israeli Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Israeli
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Israeli Single Female Poverty
19.9%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.4% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Israelis and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Israelis influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Israelis simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants from Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Israeli Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.066% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 32.2% |
| Range | 6.6% | 26.6% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 16.8% |
| Median | 2.4% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 5.7% |
Correlation Details
| Israeli Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.066% | 181,430,885 | 22.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 17,835,293 | 19.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 4,130,490 | 16.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 1,924,409 | 19.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 1,295,797 | 16.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 578,506 | 13.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 210,821 | 14.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 364,433 | 21.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.99% | 213,003 | 23.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 224,439 | 15.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 124,964 | 15.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 64,743 | 32.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 46,757 | 11.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 68,936 | 20.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.30% | 68,528 | 17.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 44,738 | 21.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 32,724 | 5.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 4,336 | 11.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.49% | 245 | 15.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 18,210 | 7.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.66% | 4,550 | 12.8% |